In this section |
Voters Support Congressional Action on Comprehensive Energy and Global Warming LegislationWant transition to clean, alternative forms of energy, job creation to curb global warming14 May 2009 Contact: Brandon MacGillis – 202.887.8830 WASHINGTON, DC (May 14, 2009) – As the House Energy and Commerce Committee prepares to markup the American Clean Energy and Security Act, the Pew Environment Group released national survey findings demonstrating overwhelming support for decisive action on behalf of clean energy jobs, energy independence and reducing the carbon pollution that causes global warming. To gain bipartisan perspective on American public opinion, the Pew Environment Group has commissioned national surveys by The Mellman Group, a leading democratic firm, and Public Opinion Strategies, a leading Republican firm. Both have worked extensively throughout the United States for a range of corporations, nonprofit organizations and elected officials. A national survey of likely 2010 general election voters conducted from March 25-29, 2009 by The Mellman Group found: Americans want action to reduce the carbon pollution that causes global warming.
Voters say their opinions of Members of Congress will be more favorable if they support a comprehensive global warming plan.
Given the option, voters prefer that a polluters’ fund - an element of a legislative proposal that would require polluting companies to pay into a fund - be used for both Research and Development (R&D) and to fund an energy tax credit:
Even after being presented with arguments frequently used by opponents of climate change legislation including the so-called “energy tax” argument – a strong majority still supports a plan to curb global warming – 62% support a plan, 39% strongly with 26% opposing, 17% strongly (73% of Democrats, 59% of Independents and 52% of Republicans). “Public support for action on global warming is overwhelming. Voters clearly understand that reducing the carbon pollution that causes global warming will improve our economy by creating clean energy jobs and enhance our security by reducing our dependence on foreign oil,” said Mark Mellman, President of The Mellman Group. The Mellman Group’s findings are mirrored by separate research by Public Opinion Strategies. Public Opinion Strategies’ research probed voter opinions on dealing with global warming pollution and the impact this may have on the U.S. economy in two separate surveys, one conducted over the telephone among 800 registered voters and the other conducted online among 1,200 adults from April 5-8. Findings show voters believe an economy using alternative energy sources would be stronger than it is today and efforts to reduce the carbon pollution that causes global warming would help our economy and create more jobs. Key findings from the Public Opinion Strategies research include: There is bipartisan enthusiasm for jobs that reduce our dependence on oil and jobs that improve energy efficiency.
Voters make the connection that efforts to combat global warming will help create jobs.
A solid majority believes an economy that is less dependent on oil and coal, and more dependent on alternative energy sources, will be stronger than it is today.
“These survey results clearly demonstrate that the American public wants its leaders to move decisively in tackling global warming. Lawmakers on Capitol Hill should listen,” said Phyllis Cuttino who directs the Pew Environment Group’s U.S. Global Warming Campaign.“Legislation must create new, enduring American jobs, protect our environment for future generations, enhance our national security and preserve America’s international reputation.” The Pew Environment Group is the conservation arm of The Pew Charitable Trusts, a non-governmental organization that applies a rigorous, analytical approach to improving public policy, informing the public and stimulating civic life. # # # View the survey findings from both The Mellman Group and Public Opinion Strategies. |
Contact UsMedia Government Relations Geoff Brown
|
